USA vs THE HEIRS OF HENRY TURNER: EL'S & BEY'S [WASHITAW-MOORS/MUURS]

DECEMBER TERM, 1850. 663 The'United States v. Turner et al. MAN, OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE, COHEIR WITH THE LAST ABOVE- NAMED PERSONS or COLUMIBUS LAWSON ; CATHARINE PAULINE BA- XER, THE WIDOW or BLAIZE CENAS, AND NOW THE WIFE OF WIL- LIAI CHRISTY, AND... More

DECEMBER TERM, 1850. 663 The'United States v. Turner et al. MAN, OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE, COHEIR WITH THE LAST ABOVE- NAMED PERSONS or COLUMIBUS LAWSON ; CATHARINE PAULINE BA- XER, THE WIDOW or BLAIZE CENAS, AND NOW THE WIFE OF WIL- LIAI CHRISTY, AND HILARY B. CENAs, AUGUSTUS HENRY CENAS, AND AUGUSTUS ST. JOHN, RIcHARD BRENEN BLANCH9, AND GEORGE CHRISTY, THE LAST FOUR BEING MINORS, AND REPRESENTED BY PAULINE ST. JOHN, THE WIDOW OF PETER CENAS, THEIR MOTHER AND NATURAL TUTRIX, ALL OF' THE STATE OF LOUISIANA; JONA- THAN MONTGODIERY AND MICHEL MUSSON, THE TESTAIENTARY EX- ECUTORS OF THE LATE WILLIAM'r NOTT, OF THE- STATE- OF LouI- SIANA, AND THE HEIRS OF NATHANIEL A'IORY, OF THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND. THIS, like the two preceding cases, was an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana, and involved the validity of the Bastrop grant. It was argued together with that of the United States against the Mayor, Aldermen, and Inhabitants of Philadelphia a Less