O?=?EH<:L:>BJY<³HGLH-L?H-EH=BQG:L:
DHGKLBLMPBYG:F?L:NBABD:L:´IHO:C>?=?J
<ZkbeI_gq_\
Hegel’s trace in “Die onto-theo-logische Verfassung der Metaphysik”
after Heidegger (by Basil Penchev).
Abstract: The question, which
animates the cited paper by Heidegger...
More
O?=?EH<:L:>BJY<³HGLH-L?H-EH=BQG:L:
DHGKLBLMPBYG:F?L:NBABD:L:´IHO:C>?=?J
<ZkbeI_gq_\
Hegel’s trace in “Die onto-theo-logische Verfassung der Metaphysik”
after Heidegger (by Basil Penchev).
Abstract: The question, which
animates the cited paper by Heidegger is: “How is God coming in
philosophy?” (Heidegger 1957: 46); and it is only a sharpening of “the
question of the onto-theological character of philosophy” (Heidegger
1957: 46).
Hegel and Heidegger are united and opposite as identity and
difference.
Both being and existing descend from difference.
Equilibrium
(Austrag) arranges the unit of being and existing.
Key words: Heidegger, Hegel, Austrag, equilibrium, God in philosophy
<tijhktldhclhh^mr_\y\ZpblbjZgZlZ\aZ]eZ\b_lhjZ[hlZgZ
OZc^_]_j_³dZd;h]b^\Z\t\nbehkhnbylZ´Heidegger 1957: 46)b
lhc_kZfh³aZhkljyg_´gZ³\tijhkZaZhglh-l_heh]bqgbyoZjZdl_jgZ
f_lZnbabdZlZ´ Heidegger 1957: 46) Lh\Z ^Ze_q g_ _ _^bgkl\_gbyl
itldh]ZlhOZc^_]_jhkfbkey³;h]Z\t\nbehkhnbylZ´GZijbf_j
"<tijhktl ^Zeb b dZd b \ dZ
Less
